The Plumas County Board of Supervisors has decided to explore options for deferring property tax payments following significant public discontent over recent tax increases. Despite a legal finding that no regulations were violated, property owners expressed frustration at how they were notified of increased property values, which led to tax hikes—some exceeding 70%. At a meeting on December 3, residents voiced their concerns, questioning the method of notification via the county website rather than individual mailings.
Interim County Counsel Josh Brechtel confirmed the legality of the notification process, citing a 2012 resolution allowing such notices to be posted online. However, residents like Mike Gardner argued that this approach lacked common sense, as many do not routinely check the assessor’s website.
The discussion also touched on Proposition 8, which allows temporary reductions in assessed value and subsequent adjustments when market conditions improve. County Chief Appraiser John Ridley explained that the recent assessments were recalibrating property values that had been temporarily lowered during the 2009 real estate downturn.
In response to the backlash, Supervisor Dwight Ceresola proposed rescinding the 2012 resolution. The meeting also addressed the possibility of deferring property tax payments, with County Tax Collector Julie White and other officials tasked with developing a plan to alleviate the financial strain on residents.
Property owners have the option to appeal their assessments, with 39 appeals already filed and adjustments made to about 10 of them. The Board of Supervisors, which also acts as the county board of equalization, can hear further appeals.
Board Chairman Greg Hagwood acknowledged the widespread impact of the tax increases and noted that while deferment might not fully resolve the issue, it could provide some relief.
